The legal review (or legal journal ) is a scientific journal focusing on legal issues. The legal review is a type of periodical law. In the US, legal review is usually published by student organizations in law schools or through lawyers associations. Outside of North America, legal review is usually edited by senior academics/faculty.
The legal review should not be confused with non-scientific publications such as the New York Law Journal or American Lawyer , which is an independent, professional and magazine covering the daily practice of law.
Video Law review
Ikhtisar
The main function of legal review is to publish scholarships in the field of law. The review of the law publishes long and comprehensive subject care ("articles"), commonly written by law professors, judges, or legal practitioners, as well as shorter pieces, commonly called "notes" and "comments," written by student law "member" of legal review.
Legal review articles often reveal the thinking of specialists or experts relating to issues with current law and potential solutions to the problem. Historically, legal review articles have had an effect on legal development; they have been frequently cited as a persuasive authority by courts in the United States. For example, Judge Stanley Mosk of the California Supreme Court acknowledged that he got the idea for market share obligations from the review of Fordham's Overview which is widely quoted in the court's crucial decision at Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories (1980). However, in recent years, some have claimed that the traditional influence of legal review is declining.
Most American law schools publish legal reviews (or "legal journals"), generally deal with all legal areas and are named after schools, and some publish special reviews, deal with specific areas of the law, in addition to or in places of general law review, civil and civil liberties, international law, environmental law, or human rights. There are also a small number of journals that focus on issues of law, regulation, and public policy. See List of legal reviews in the United States for details.
In recent years, many legal reviews have begun publishing online-only content in addition to their respective print issues. They offer freely available short-term scholarship pieces, analyzes, and legal comments. Furthermore, some legal journals have left the print entirely, instead choosing to publish all their content only on the Internet.
Maps Law review
Editorial staff
United States
In the United States, legal review is usually edited by a certain percentage of the top students in the class or students selected to join after successfully completing "writing about the competition" at the end of the first year of their law school. As a professor of law Erwin N. Griswold writes about the Harvard Law Review: "Some people worry that a major legal magazine in the United States is edited and managed by students.This is an unusual situation, but it begins that way , and it grows strongly from its own strength ". During the 1990s, the American Bar Association followed and began to coordinate practitioners 'journals with law schools, linking student editors' bodies to publications including the Administrative Legal Review , International Lawyers Journal of Public Contract Law , and Urban Lawyer . Although Griswold was confident in student editors, criticism of the practice continued. In 2004, Judge Richard Posner wrote a critical account entitled "Against the Law Reviews" in the Legal Section magazine. However, Posner also wrote that his own time as president of the Harvard Law Review represents "Golden Age... for legal review edited by students".
Canada
In Canada, the full student-run legal review (without the chief editor-in-chief faculty) includes, in the order of frequencies cited by the Supreme Court of Canada: the McGill Law Journal/Revue de droit de McGill Journal of the Queen's Law , Legal Review of Alberta, Law Faculty of Law Faculty of Toronto, University of Ottawa Law Review , and University of British Columbia Legal Review . Membership requires urgent time commitment, and many editors turn to top clerkships, top articling or first-year associate positions both inside and outside Canada, or eventually join a legal professoriate in Canada. The country also has some special publications run entirely by students. Europe
Outside of North America, the student's legal review is an exception rather than a norm. In Continental European law review is almost uniformly edited by academics. However, a small number of legal reviews edited by students have recently appeared in Germany ( Ad Legendum , Bucerius Law Journal , Freibaw Freibaw Student Journal > i>, International Legal Journal of Goettingen , Legal Review of Hanse , Legal Review of Heidelberg, Marburg Law Review ), Netherlands ( Groningen Journal International Law and the Czech Republic ( Legal Review ). Two student-run publications have also been established in Italy: Bocconi Legal Papers , adopting a working paper format format, as a way to complement - rather than compete with peer-reviewed publications and offer additional rounds of feedback scholars; Legal Review of the University of Bologna , a peer-to-date legal journal, run by the University of Bologna, a student of the Law Faculty, who follows The Bluebook: A Uniform System of Citation.
Belgium
In Belgium, the most well-known student review of the most famous law is the Jura Falconis . The organization was founded by a group of students from the Faculty of Law of the Catholic University of Leuven who, in 1964, had the idea of ​​making their own legal journals grafted onto a famous American legal review. Since then, the Jura Falconis has grown into the most powerful and most unusual value in Belgian legal literature.
French
The leading legal review in France is from Dalloz and LexisNexis.
United Kingdom
In the United Kingdom, as in many Commonwealth outside North America (except for Australia), all the leading legal reviews are edited and run by academics. The most well-known legal review of the UK and Commonwealth is the Law Quarterly Review (first published 1885), the Modern Law Review (first published 1937), Cambridge Law Journal (first published 1973), The Oxford Journal of Legal Studies (first published 1981) and Legal Studies (first published 1981).
The Bracton Law Journal (now Exeter Law Review ) is the first legal review students conducted when it began publishing in 1965. Since then, the Birkbeck Law Review >, Bristol Legal Review , Cambridge Legal Review Review , Dundee Student Review , Durham Law Review , > Edinburgh Student Law Review Legal Review of Warwick Students , Southampton Student Law Review , Legal Review of Strathclyde , > UCL Human Rights Review and The Student Law Journal has also appeared.
Italy
The Trento Student Law Review (TSLR) is a student-run legal review based in Trento, Italy. Established in Trento in 2017, TSLR publishes its first edition, called "Zero Number", in January 2018.
Bocconi Legal Papers is a legal journal edited by students in Italy. This is a project sponsored by the Bocconi School of Law and published by a group of students belonging to the same institution, under the supervision of several faculty advisors.
The University of Bologna Law Review is a student-run law published by the Department of Law Studies of the University of Bologna, and is officially sponsored by Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP. His Council of Advisers consists of several scholars and practitioners from all over the world.
ireland
The most professionally edited legal review in Ireland includes the following:
- Overview Bar
- Commercial Law Practitioners
- Journal of Construction, Engineering, and Energy Law
- Legal Journal of Delivery and Property
- Dublin University Law Journal
- Hibernian Journal of Law
- Irish Criminal Journal
- Irish Employment Law Journal
- Ireland's Environmental and Planning Journal
- The Irish Probate Journal of Law
- Irish Law Times
- Irish Journal of Family Law
- Irish Journal of Practice and Procedure
- Medico-Legal Journal of Ireland
- The Irish Jurist
The leading student legal review is Legal Reviews of Dublin City University , Legal Review of Trinity College , UCD Law Review , Ireland Student Legal Review and Cork Online Law Review .
Nordic Countries
In Iceland, the ÃÆ'Å¡lfljÃÆ'³tur Law Review , has been published since 1947. In 2007, the celebration celebrated its 60th anniversary. Since its creation in 1947 has been edited and run by students in the Department of Law, University of Iceland. The ÃÆ'Ã…,lfljÃÆ'³tur Law Review is the most senior of all academic journals that are still in university publications and are upheld by Icelandic jurists and law scholars.
In Finland, the Helsinki Law Review, edited by students at the University of Helsinki, has been active since 2007. Previously, Turku University published the Turku Law Journal from 1999 to 2003.
The first legal review in Sweden is Juridisk Public . The first number of Juridisk Publications was published in April 2009. It originated as a review by students from the University of Stockholm. It is now sent to Swedish law students from all universities, as well as most law libraries in the country. Juridisk Publikation edited by top students from law school in Lund, Stockholm Uppsala and Goteborg. This publication is anonymously reviewed by the leading Swedish law and academic council of practitioners.
In Norway, the first edited student legal review Jussens Venner was founded in 1952 by students of Carsten Smith and Torkel Opsahl (both of whom later became prominent academics). Sometimes he displays peer-reviewed articles, but his editor consists of one student from the Faculty of Law at the University of Oslo and one student from the Law Faculty at the University of Bergen. His articles are mainly related to the curriculum at these universities. Argentina
Apart from some exceptions, in Argentina almost all legal reviews are run by publishers or law professors. In both cases, student involvement in today's creation of this review is completely narrowed down. Amongst these exceptions, it should be mentioned the case of Revista Lecciones y Ensayos , a legal review run by students from the University of Buenos Aires Law Faculty.
Australia
In Australia, an edited peer-reviewed student academic review review is Melbourne University Legal Review , Sydney Legal Review , Federal Legal Review , Legal Review of Monash University and Journal of Laws of the UNSW .
The Melbourne Legal Review regularly outperforms the Sydney Legal Review about impacts, excerpts in journals and combined cases and ratings. This publication is the most widely cited legal review by the High Court of Australia and among the most cited US non-US articles.
The top international law journals in Australia are Melbourne International Law Journal , as well as an academic review of peer review reviews. The Melbourne Journal of International Law is also considered more influential and prestigious than most generalist legal reviews in Australia.
Brazil
In Brazil, legal review is usually run by academics as well, but there are attempts by students to change this; for example: University of Brasilia Legal Studies (re-established in 2007), Afonso Pena Center Overview from the Federal University of Minas Gerais (published since 1996), and Alethes Periodic from the Federal University of Juiz de Fora. However, academics and official rankings typically refuse to evaluate student legal reviews as "equals". To pursue academic recognition by the Brazilian Ministry of Education, the review body should include post-graduate and undergraduate academics, which prevent student legal review even recognized or compared to other similar legal magazines.
China
In China, there are legal reviews run by academics, as well as legal reviews run by students.
The China Law Journal is an effort to create legal publications, produced from all law-related groups, including lawyers, academics, students, judicial members, procurators and others in areas related to interests in China.
India
Among the academic law journals in India, the Indian Law School Journal and Delhi Law Review published by the Faculty of Law, University of Delhi since 1972 are among the most prominent and respected among Bachelors law and academics of India. The National Law School/University is now leading the field of legal review publications, with important reviews being the NALSAR Student Review Review and the School of Law Review of Indian Schools and lawbright, eJournal.
Mexico
The Mexican Legal Review , legal review from Mexico's National Autonomous University, Mexico's leading university, edited by professors and therefore closer cousins ​​to peer-reviewed social science journals than typical junior-run journals.
Online legal research provider
Online legal research providers such as Westlaw and LexisNexis give users access to the full text of most of the legal reviews published from the late 1980s. Other services like that, Heinonline, provide an actual scan of legal review pages that will return to the 1850s.
Student activity
Membership in legal review staff is highly sought after by some law students, as it often has a significant impact on their subsequent career as lawyers. Many US federal judges and partners in the most prestigious law firm are members or editors of their school legal reviews. There are a number of reasons why journal membership is desired by some students:
- Some people see intense writing, research, and editing experiences as invaluable for student development as lawyers;
- Others see the selection process as helping distinguish the best and the brightest from the already strong group of law students.
In schools with more than one legal review, membership in major or eminent journals is usually considered more prestigious than membership in special law journals. However, this does not happen in all schools. In many schools, more prestigious journals are specialized journals; a low-level general journal rarely attracts the attention of many of the leading category-specific journals. Often the best indicator is the age of the journal; Newer journals rarely have the same effect with employers who have older journals, even when older journals have specialized. However, membership in such journals is a valuable credential when looking for work after law school.
Paths for membership vary from law school to law school, as well as from journal to journal, but generally contain some of the same basic elements. Most legal reviews choose members after the first year of their studies either through writing competitions (often referred to as "writing on" for legal review), their first year grades (referred to as "judgments on" for legal review) or some combination thereof. However, most Canadian legal reviews do not take into account the value and can not be filed with the app. A number of schools will also provide memberships to students who independently submit articles that are published. Written competitions usually require applicants to develop a written analysis of a particular legal topic, often recent Supreme Court decisions. Written submissions are often set, and applicants are sometimes given some or all background research. Delivery is usually assessed blindly, with the submission only identified by a number that will not be attributable to a particular applicant by the class student. A student who has been selected for law review membership is said to have "made a legal review."
The secondary journal varies greatly in their membership process. For example, at Yale Law School, the only one of nine journals that have a competitive membership process is the flagship of the Yale Law Journal - all others are open to every Yale Law student wishing to join. In contrast, other secondary journals may have their own membership competition, or may hold a competition along with a major legal review.
Membership legal review is usually divided into staff members and editors. In most legal reviews, all 2L (second year students) are temporary staff members some or all 3L (third year students) serve as editors. 3L also typically fills senior editorial staff positions, including senior article editors, senior notes & amp; editor of comments, senior managing editor, and, most prestigious of all, editor-in-chief of legal review. (Upon graduation, the editor-in-chief of a legal review can often expect to be recruited by the most prestigious law firm.) As a member, students are usually expected to:
- Write notes or comments of a quality that can be published (though not necessarily published), and for
- Edit and cite-check articles published by legal review, ensuring that references support what their author claims support and footnotes are in the exact Bluebook format depending on the publishing preferences.
Editorial staff are usually responsible for reviewing and selecting articles for publication, managing editing processes, and helping members write their notes and comments. Depending on the law school, students may receive academic credits for their work on legal review, although some journals are fully extracurricular.
Legal history history
United States
The University of Pennsylvania Legal Review is the oldest legal review in the US, which has been published since 1852. Also among the oldest and most storied legal review publications is the Albany Law Review , a substitute < i> Albany Law School Journal , which began in 1875 and is a legal review first edited by students; The Columbia Law Review, a substitute of Columbia Jurist, began in 1885; The Harvard Law Review, beginning in 1887; Journal of Yale Law , beginning in 1891; West Virginia Law Review , beginning in 1894; and Dickinson's Legal Review , beginning in 1897. The first legal review that originated outside the Northeast was the Michigan Law Review , beginning in 1902; followed by the Northwestern University Law Review , beginning in 1906; and Kentucky Law Journal, beginning in 1910. The California Law Review, beginning in 1912, is the country's first legal review published in western Illinois.
See also
- Stem journal
References
External links
- Bernard Hibbitts, Last Post? Reassessing the Legal Review in the Cyberspace Era
- Up-to-Date Issues from the Top Legal Review
Source of the article : Wikipedia
0 Comments